There Ought to be a School of Cultural Built Heritage

Professional Associations

cropped-SAHANZ-logo-horiz-web-1
oeh-logo-black-png-no-bounding
download
logocor-e1407796393448
Australian-Institute-of-Architects_mono_pos-logo

114_Belmont_Road_Mosman_2Cultural built heritage provides many opportunities for development. In the adaptive-re-use or re-purposing stream of construction, heritage buildings can be radically transformed. Old cinemas can become apartments; factories can be turned into offices and post offices into hotels etc. However, due to the rarity and irreplaceability of the heritage fabric that is affected, there is both an art and a rare science involved in this. As a result, professionals are called in to preside over the various transformations of heritage buildings.

Building permits and approvals are bogged down with necessary analyses and assessments of impact. Owners and developers take a dim view of the process and are generally inclined to become frustrated.

In turn, councils set highly particularised policies in their development control plans (DCPs) identifying precisely what is and is not allowed in terms of how heritage buildings and streetscapes may be altered. Such DCPs become sore points for more frustration on the part of owners and developers who perceive councils to be unfairly dictating to the whims and vagaries of aestheticism at the cost of owners’ real and demonstrable needs.

114_Belmont_Road_Mosman_46Unlike academies of science or medicine, there is not a school of heritage. The discipline of heritage draws simultaneously on a number of separate faculties. Clearly, the basic precepts of architecture are involved, but also town planning, building technology, history, research, advocacy and the arts. The hybrid nature of the discipline and its relatively limited scope of application as a career prevent academies or TAFEs (polytechnics) from offering the course to students – probably because low intake would not make it economically viable for such institutions. Yet, the fact that those working in the field are not governed by any formal set of qualifications results in uneven advice and irregular approaches taken by different heritage consultants operating in the building industry and allied fields. 

This also has a bearing on public support for the discipline. All too often owners, developers and councils complain about the radically different and unexpected approaches taken by heritage consultants when advising clients on how to transform their heritage buildings and what to expect from councils. 

Without schools offering the course at TAFE or university level as a career discipline, the ideal of a principled approach that has the respect and buy-in of peers, institutions and academies (universities and TAFE) will result in uneven and the varying quality of heritage advice. This lack of consensus ultimately operates as a disservice to owners and developers.

11_Thames_Street_Balmain_2Education is a key factor in the ability of a local heritage management system to operate effectively, but so too is promotion. What does a local council need to do to proselytise the virtues, values and merits of cultural built heritage (CBH) and what is the ultimate purpose of promotion? 

It is generally believed that people need and crave cultural stimulation in society. They may derive this from music, film, art or dance or by simply being exposed to various modes of tangible and intangible cultural significance such as festivals, folk art events, traditional religious ceremonies etc. CBH has a psychologically reassuring effect on the psyche. It is both grounding and orienting by providing static reassurance, recurrence and predictability within a fluid, dynamic and ever-changing urban environment. In this respect, newness is counteracted with resemblance – a necessary antidote to civic dynamism and visual fracturing so prevalent in contemporary urban environments today. Heritage buildings have to compete with giant 4 storey high neon Coke signs and other forms of advertising and it is disappointing in the extreme to see heritage losing out and becoming marginalised and almost trivialised in the process. 

Paul Rappoport – Heritage 21 – 11 December 2014

Related Articles

article-1
Heritage – are we losing the battle?

Enshrined in Goal 11 of the 2015 Sustainable Development Goals, the following aims are set out; Goal 11: Make cities…

Read more
article-1
Conservation Areas – Ambience, Form and Scale

Insofar as local councils in NSW are concerned, the general objectives in a residential conservation area typically, are to conserve…

Read more
article-1
5 top things to know about heritage design

To all heritage architects/ consultants/ advisors/ builders/ planners/ managers and owners out there - there are five cardinal principles that…

Read more
article-1
Tensions in Cultural Heritage Tourism

What is the relationship between cultural heritage tourism, the community and heritage places in any given locality? Which comes first,…

Read more
Need help getting started?

Check out our guides.

article-1
Heritage – are we losing the battle?

Since the robust days of the 1970s and the 1980s during which NSW governments and councils committed wholeheartedly and enthusiastically…

Read more
article-1
Five things you need to know about cultural built heritage

Having worked in the heritage space for the better part of thirty years, I have come to rely upon five…

Read more
article-1
Incentivising Ownership of Heritage Buildings

In response to the recent enquiry by the government relating to the NSW Heritage Act, I made the following recommendation.…

Read more

526dad159320ae83e6a08364079da7b7a1b6ece0

Complete the form below to contact us today.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
By signing in you agree with the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy