ICOMOS Rejects Proposed Planning Bill

Professional Associations

cropped-SAHANZ-logo-horiz-web-1
oeh-logo-black-png-no-bounding
download
logocor-e1407796393448
Australian-Institute-of-Architects_mono_pos-logo

114 Belmont Road Mosman 2On 10 November 2013, Australia International Council on Monument and Sites (ICOMOS) wrote to the Honourable Member of Parliament, Luke Foley imploring him and his party not to support the upcoming legislation which intends to radically change the planning system in New South Wales. The legislation comprises the Planning Bill 2013 and the Planning Administration Bill 2013.  Both bills have already passed through the Legislative Assembly. The Planning Bill, in its current form would have an unacceptable impact on the State’s heritage; 90% of which is managed through the local government planning system.

Australia ICOMOS has lodged repeated submissions at every stage of the planning review process in response to the Issues Paper, Green Paper and White Paper, A New Planning System for NSW. Australia ICOMOS is the Australian branch of ICOMOS, the international non-governmental organisation of cultural heritage professionals founded in 1965. ICOMOS works for the conservation and protection of cultural heritage places across the world has members and national committees in more than 100 countries and is an advisory body to UNESCO on World Heritage matters. Australia ICOMOS members are highly regarded internationally and as innovators in heritage management.

In late August ICOMOS wrote to the Premier to express its dismay at the adverse impacts on the cultural heritage of New South Wales. The proposed measures will diminish the 40-year achievement of robust heritage legislation in NSW and would send a message to the community that economic growth and development is what really matters, not our cultural heritage. ICOMOS maintains that the majority of the heritage concerns and those expressed in many of the over 4,000 submissions made in response to the Exposure Bill, have been ignored by the government and those charged with drafting the legislation.

ICOMOS remains of the view that the Bills compromise ‘best conservation practice’ and management of our cultural heritage. The fact that strategic plans (particularly Regional and Sub-regional plans) need to take no cognizance of local heritage items and heritage conservation areas is truly alarming and is bound to have a lasting and adverse effect on cultural heritage in New South Wales.

The Bills deliberately downplay the importance of cultural heritage to communities and do not have separate objectives or distinct heads of consideration for cultural heritage. Instead, cultural heritage is lumped in with the ‘environment’ without any specific mention of conservation objectives. ICOMOS points out that ‘code assessment’ on local heritage items is inappropriate and potentially destructive.

The letter was signed on behalf of Australia ICOMOS and in particular by the following list of heritage luminaries;

  • Elizabeth Vines, OAM, President Australia ICOMOS, Adjunct Professor
  • Kristal Buckley, AM, International Vice President, ICOMOS
  • Hon Dr Barry Jones, AO
  • Dr James Kerr, AM
  • Professor Colin Sullivan AO
  • Dr Jack Mundey AO
  • Mr John Morris
  • Dr Clive Lucas, OBE, Architect
  • Ian Stapleton, Architect
  • Howard Tanner AM, Architect, Professorial Fellow
  • David Logan, Architect
  • Malcolm Garder, Valuer
  • Meredith Walker AM
  • Adjunct Professor Dr Shirley Fitzgerald
  • Peter Watts AM, Architect
  • Ian Carroll OAM
  • Professor David Throsby

Paul Rappoport – Heritage 21 – 1 May 2015

Related Articles

article-1
Are we heading for a major showdown on Transport Oriented Development in heritage areas?

Already, the NSW State Government is fighting against Ku-ring-Gai wanting to slap interim heritage orders (IHOs) on its Heritage Conservation…

Read more
article-1
Upcoming Heritage Issues in Transport Oriented Development Areas (TODs)

Recently, the new legislation introduced by the NSW State Government from the Department of Planning and Environment, promotes affordable housing…

Read more
article-1
Incentivising Ownership of Heritage Buildings

In response to the recent enquiry by the government relating to the NSW Heritage Act, I made the following recommendation.…

Read more
article-1
Does the NSW Heritage Act Reflect the Expectations of the NSW community?

In the recent NSW Heritage Act inquiry, I submitted a series of recommendations to the government seeking community response in…

Read more
Need help getting started?

Check out our guides.

article-1
Common Misunderstandings and Misconceptions of Heritage – Part 1

Heritage is rife with many misconceptions in several areas. Such misunderstandings can result in increasing uncertainties around altering listed properties…

Read more
article-1
Creating a space for the experts: Heritage decision-making in NSW

For many years, I’ve been thinking about the cumbersome nature of (especially DAs) heritage approvals in NSW. Given that cultural…

Read more
article-1
Quality versus Quantity: How can we reform our heritage lists?

It’s about time that a review is conducted to assess our heritage lists in NSW. We have recently seen heritage…

Read more

526dad159320ae83e6a08364079da7b7a1b6ece0

Complete the form below to contact us today.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
By signing in you agree with the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy