Professional Associations

Recently, there have been several articles written about the concept masterplan for the redevelopment of five heritage buildings by Merivale in the heart of Sydney’s CBD. These sandstone, Victorian-era buildings are situated in Clarence, King and York Streets, and includes the heritage items, Gardiner House, Henley House and National House.
The plans have been approved by City of Sydney Council and is hoped to contribute to the 24-hour revitalisation of Sydney nightlife and our entertainment and hospitality venues.

However, a common trend among these articles is the backlash from members of the local communities and NIMBYs (Not-In-My-Back-Yard) who are concerned about the noise and disruptions from these venues and their construction. They are also apprehensive about the potential for overdevelopment, the loss of commercial space and the lack of community consultation.
In my view, these negatives are outweighed by the positives of this redevelopment. From a heritage perspective, Merivale and architect firms, Woods Bagot and SJB have given much consideration for how they would conserve the significant fabric, retain the façade and reinstate original openings in the basement levels while making the required changes to bring the sites together and comply with safety regulations. They are mindful of the heritage character for both the buildings and the York Street Heritage Conservation Area.
These sites on Clarence, King and York Streets also currently accommodate commercial use, having originally been converted from 1880s warehouses into office spaces with restaurants or eateries. This redevelopment would further maximise their adaptive reuse potential and functionality, and create a more highly concentrated hub of entertainment, hospitality and recreational venues while still housing office space. Economically, it will provide more jobs and money, which could help individuals and families struggling with cost-of-living issues.

On the other hand, I would also argue that Merivale could have engaged more with the community. Further consultation could have helped to ease locals’ concerns by discussing how they would maintain reasonable noise and access standards during and after construction. More of the commercial offices could also be kept.
Yet, there would be some individuals who would always remain opposed – it then becomes about finding the right balance.
Overall, I am generally in favour of this project and am interested to see how it progresses. This new Entertainment Precinct presents a good opportunity for collaboration between heritage and new commercial development, in a time when heritage is often considered a barrier.
Paul Rappoport
Conservation Architect and Heritage Planner
6 November 2025
References:
Aldred, Max. “Sydney NIMBYs steamrolled by nightlife icon’s $56m heritage venture.” Sky News, October 24, 2025. Sydney NIMBYs steamrolled by nightlife icon’s $56m heritage venture | Sky News Australia.
Burnett, Clare. “Merivale Entertainment Concept Approved.” The Urban Developer, October 28, 2025. Merivale Entertainment Precinct Concept Approved | The Urban Developer.
Nourse, Pat. “The 53 best rooftop bars in Sydney.” TimeOut, February, 5, 2025. 53 best rooftop bars in Sydney to grab a drink at.

Need help getting started?
Check out our guides.
Related Articles
A Response to the Rezoning Plans for Sydney Central Station
Last week, I read an article in the Sydney Morning Herald about how the NSW Government has been considering a…
Read more
Remembrance of Things Past – Central Station
When talking about passion projects from my career, I would have to say that Central Station has brought me the…
Read more
Rose Bay Heritage
Heritage 21 is very honoured to have been a part of restoring this cottage to its original glory
Read more
Complete the form below to contact us today.







