Workable Heritage Policies

Professional Associations

cropped-SAHANZ-logo-horiz-web-1
oeh-logo-black-png-no-bounding
download
logocor-e1407796393448
Australian-Institute-of-Architects_mono_pos-logo

In the age of corporatisation, the public realm has shrunk.  The public realm comprises public goods  like hospitals, education, the Internet, public parks and heritage.  Most governments in the developed world today are ruled under a neo-liberal agenda  This means that public infrastructure provisioning is rolled out by corporations on behalf of governments.  It is called PPPs – Public Private Partnerships. These partnerships are responsible for building our schools, our rail, our roads, our sewerage treatment works and many other forms of infrastructure. 

The government relies upon such corporations to deliver public sector provisioning.  The government itself does not produce so much as facilitate the production of these goods.  However, the corporations that deliver the goods are bound by shareholder interests.  This makes these corporations more answerable to profit than it does to the needs of the common man. Heritage places can be defined as both public and private assets.

A little known fact is that more than 90% of the listed stock in Australia is privately owned, yet it is regulated by government agencies. The listing of heritage buildings is motivated by the public’s concern for the preservation and conservation of important heritage places. However, there is also the privately owned component. Our heritage management systems in Australia do not acknowledge the private burden of heritage that is carried by owners. The burden is constituted by the cost of maintenance as well as the loss of potential to re-develop land under a heritage listing.

The system has no built-in mechanism to address this.  Listing agencies naively assume that listing of itself is sufficient to control the heritage asset insofar as the public interest is concerned.  However, there is little control in the post-listing episode.  There is very little policing.  There is hardly any financial support for owners and thus, in consequence, there is little interest by developers in utilising the stock for adaptive re-use purposes. 

This situation gives rise to a negative perception of heritage. Yet with careful analysis and proper reasoning, it is possible to revamp our heritage management policies to embrace the needs of private owners and developers without compromising the innate significance of the stock.  Rappoport is committed to formulating such policies and is devoted to the resolution of balancing the needs of private owners with that of the public interest concern.

77-Shaftesbury-Road-Burwood-18-300x199 

 Heritage policies need to be crafted in order to better address the needs of private owners. The system needs to be revamped to make it worthwhile for owners, developers and incoming purchasers. Their needs are required to inform heritage policies for the future because the current system is alienating and dis-incentivising.

Paul Rappoport – Heritage 21 – 24 November 2011

Related Articles

article-1
New Ways of Assessing Heritage Impact

The system we use today in NSW and Australia generally to assess heritage impact is limited and perhaps slightly old…

Read more
article-1
Taxing tourism to pay for cultural built heritage

The World Bank (2010) writes that a good investment climate for tourism, underpinned by a sound tax regime, can play…

Read more
article-1
Heritage-Tourism – Loving it to Death

How often have we all heard or read the phrase; “Tourism is a driver of economic development”.

Read more
article-1
Is Heritage in the Public or Private Interest?

Clearly, the development and pro- conservation approaches are like ships passing in the night. Will there ever be a happy…

Read more
Need help getting started?

Check out our guides.

article-1
Incentivising Ownership of Heritage Buildings

In response to the recent enquiry by the government relating to the NSW Heritage Act, I made the following recommendation.…

Read more
article-1
Does the NSW Heritage Act Reflect the Expectations of the NSW community?

In the recent NSW Heritage Act inquiry, I submitted a series of recommendations to the government seeking community response in…

Read more
article-1
A New Heritage Council for NSW

In the recent NSW Heritage Act inquiry, I submitted a series of recommendations to the government seeking community response in…

Read more

526dad159320ae83e6a08364079da7b7a1b6ece0

Complete the form below to contact us today.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
By signing in you agree with the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy