Decision-Making Processes for Cultural Built Heritage in Australia

We currently have so many systems for cultural built heritage in Australia. Is there a way to better manage Australia’s heritage buildings?

Professional Associations

cropped-SAHANZ-logo-horiz-web-1
oeh-logo-black-png-no-bounding
download
logocor-e1407796393448
Australian-Institute-of-Architects_mono_pos-logo

We have so many systems for cultural built heritage in Australia today. I have counted more than 90. For example, in NSW, we have approximately 150 different jurisdictions – just at the local level. Then for State Heritage, we have one, for the Commonwealth, we have another, and for National, another again.

Apart from this, there’s the National Trust of NSW and its listings, as well as specialties like engineering listings, DOCOMOMO, post-war and Australian Institute of Architecture (AIA) listings. This is just in NSW. Count all the rest of the jurisdictions in Australia and you get close to the 90 mark.

Medium-close up, side exterior shot of the Vienna Cottage in Hunter’s Hill, NSW. Sandstone cottage with small, timber framed windows, pitched roof, and front veranda.

Why are there so many? Mainly because of the way in which the lists developed. They have materialised in a haphazard fashion.

The first list was developed by the National Trust in the 1960s. Many of our local listings owe their reason for being on the trailblazing efforts by the National Trust, after which, local listings grew.

In the 1970s, during Whitlam’s era, the Register of the National Estate (RNE) was established by Tom Uren and Robert Marsden Hope. At the time of closing, the register comprised of 13,200 items, many of the listings under RNE was Australia’s first attempt at establishing a list for the entire country. However, the listing ultimately failed and was shut down. Many of the RNE listings were picked up by other listing systems as time went on.

Notwithstanding, my main concern today is that there is a wide discrepancy in decision-making regarding cultural built heritage in Australia. On one side, we have a very timid approach which relies heavily on Local Environment Plan (LEP) and Development Control Plan (DCP) guidelines. At the other end of the spectrum is well-informed and confident decisions about cultural built heritage, usually espoused by architects and consultants with a wealth of experience and knowledge in the field. In-between, there are 50 shades of grey.

In the UK, they have what is called the ‘National Policy Planning Framework’ document. The NPPF provides a guideline for officers working in local Government, including Scotland, Ireland and Wales. In addition to this, an entire British standard for heritage decision-making in the UK.

a close-up shot of a title on the opening page of a PDF document or book, which reads National Policy Planning Framework. A faded out, blue logo in top left corner, and a black and white image cut off below the title.
Fig. 3 National Planning Policy Framework – Why Does it Really Need Changing? (In Webb Developments. 2023.)

In Australia, we have nothing. However, over the years, there have been various attempts at providing a NPPF for heritage.

It is no wonder that our Australian Governments are beset enormous discrepancies in the way individuals make decisions about cultural built heritage. Why don’t we have our own NPPF? Why doesn’t Australia have a cultural built heritage standard?

The problem we have today is the lack of consistency, not only between states, but also between council jurisdictions – even within those councils. Such a situation isn’t very helpful, especially for applicants, who sometimes spend hundreds of dollars putting together a Development Application (DA).

I have often contemplated producing a document akin to the UK NPPF. I have thought of bringing together the most experienced architects and town planners to make this happen. I have even thought of doing a PhD to narrow down the range to promote a much higher degree for applicants lodging expensive DA’s that involve heritage.

I still think it is one of the most important things yet to be done.

At the end of the day, we need to narrow down the type of decision-making in order to be less subjective. I also believe that it is necessary to throw in factors that are currently ignored. For instance, ‘economic viability’. I am of the view that all decisions ultimately lead to economic viability. In situations where applicants seek to provide the only and last economically viable solution, these are often ignored by councils without batting an eyelid. Today, historical, aesthetic and associative significance plays an enormous part. I fail to see why economic viability in today’s world, is not more important than history and aesthetics.

I hope to continue with this topic in other blogs, and I look forward to your comments.

 

Paul Rappoport

Conservation Architect and Heritage Planner

2 October 2024

 

 

Image references:

“Everglades House and Gardens Leura – National Trust NSW: A Charming 1930s Art Deco House & Cold Climate Garden in Leura.” Blue Mountains Mums. March 12, 2022.  Everglades House and Gardens Leura – National Trust NSW: A Charming 1930s Art Deco House & Cold Climate Garden In Leura – Blue Mountains Mums.

“National Planning Policy Framework – Why Does it Really Need Changing?” Webb Developments. February 22, 2023.  National Planning Policy Framework – Why Does It Really Need Changing? – Webb Developments (webb-developments.com)

“Vienna Cottage – National Trust”. National Trust of NSW. 2024. vienna cottage nsw national trust – Search (bing.com)

 

 

 

Related Articles

article-1
Five Fun Facts about Federation-style Heritage Houses

For most heritage experts, discussing the common types of heritage architectural styles in NSW and Australia becomes second nature. However,…

Read more
article-1
Why doesn’t NSW adopt good design principles for heritage buildings?

There ought to be a qualification for all designs in relation to heritage buildings. Our heritage-listed items and buildings in…

Read more
article-1
Heritage Disconnect

Dr. Robyn Clinch (see reference below) writes that there is a considerable disconnect between the theoretical education of potential heritage…

Read more
article-1
Unlisted Heritage Items – Erring on the Side of Caution

Most countries, regions and states utilise heritage listing as a means of protecting heritage assets, but many of these lists…

Read more
Need help getting started?

Check out our guides.

article-1
Are we heading for a major showdown on Transport Oriented Development in heritage areas?

Already, the NSW State Government is fighting against Ku-ring-Gai wanting to slap interim heritage orders (IHOs) on its Heritage Conservation…

Read more
article-1
Remembrance of Things Past – Central Station

When talking about passion projects from my career, I would have to say that Central Station has brought me the…

Read more
article-1
Five Fun Facts about Federation-style Heritage Houses

For most heritage experts, discussing the common types of heritage architectural styles in NSW and Australia becomes second nature. However,…

Read more

526dad159320ae83e6a08364079da7b7a1b6ece0

Complete the form below to contact us today.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
By signing in you agree with the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy