Five things you need to know about cultural built heritage

Professional Associations

cropped-SAHANZ-logo-horiz-web-1
oeh-logo-black-png-no-bounding
download
logocor-e1407796393448
Australian-Institute-of-Architects_mono_pos-logo

Having worked in the heritage space for the better part of thirty years, I have come to rely upon five home truths when it comes to dealing with heritage buildings.

1. Always look for opportunities for conservation.
The applicant who seeks to introduce change into a heritage setting is always happy to pay for conservation works if there is some sort of uplift for him or her. Developers provide the opportunity for conservation, but they need to be respected and thanked for the conservation works that they are usually required to do by the council. At the same time, development must be limited to parts of the building with less heritage significance.

2. The owners of heritage buildings are custodians of the heritage asset.
They need to be treated with respect and encouraged by the community via council to safeguard the asset in perpetuity. When the owners of a heritage building decide to sell the property, the incoming new owner will take the baton to continue in the role of custodian. More work needs to be done by the government in promoting heritage as a public good in society.

3. Additions and extensions to heritage buildings should be done in the form of a pavilion.
This means physical separation of the new from the old via an under-eaves link so that there is no confusion between the original fabric and the introduced fabric.

4. Even if a heritage-listed asset is privately owned, it really belongs to the community.
It is usually the community that agitates for the protection of the heritage buildings. Councils are aware of this.

5. The heritage asset is the client.
When we, as heritage architects and consultants, deal with modifying heritage buildings, we should always have the building’s best interests at heart. This means treating all significant fabric with the utmost care and concern and only ever making appropriate and reversible changes.

Related Articles

article-1
Heritage, Gentrification, Urbanisation & Tourism

Historic conservation, writes Regina Bures (see reference below), is frequently associated with gentrification: the incursion of middle-class "gentry" on an…

Read more
article-1
Heritage is indicative of truths as they emerge from contemporary practice

How often is it said that we view the past through our own eyes. Here we are in 2018 viewing…

Read more
article-1
Is Heritage Chauvinistic?

David Lowenthal writes that heritage betokens interest in manifold legacies – family history, familiar landmarks, historic buildings, art and antiques,…

Read more
article-1
Why is heritage conservation good for society?

I can think of ten good reasons why heritage conservation is not only good for society but healthy too. I…

Read more
Need help getting started?

Check out our guides.

article-1
Heritage – are we losing the battle?

Since the robust days of the 1970s and the 1980s during which NSW governments and councils committed wholeheartedly and enthusiastically…

Read more
article-1
Incentivising Ownership of Heritage Buildings

In response to the recent enquiry by the government relating to the NSW Heritage Act, I made the following recommendation.…

Read more
article-1
Does the NSW Heritage Act Reflect the Expectations of the NSW community?

In the recent NSW Heritage Act inquiry, I submitted a series of recommendations to the government seeking community response in…

Read more

526dad159320ae83e6a08364079da7b7a1b6ece0

Complete the form below to contact us today.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
By signing in you agree with the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy